I've been wondering about this myself for a while. Reviews that I've seen of the Olympus E300 make a big deal about its 8MP resolution in comparison with the 6MP of the *istD, DS etc and the comparable Nikons and Canons. But the reviews never mention the smaller sensor size of the Olympus.
All else being equal, I would expect the larger sensor to produce better quality enlargements, similar to the way that medium format can produce better enlargements than 35 mm - but I suppose in digital all else is rarely equal! Cheers Brian Cheers, Brian +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Brian Walters Western Sydney, Australia Quoting Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Good question and one I never think to ask. > > Jack > > --- Bill Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Where is the crossover point where sensor size overtakes the > number > > of > > megapixels in regards to final print quality. > > > > Bill > > > >
