Paul, Based on your comment, here is the fixed version:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2191a.htm along with the original http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2191.htm -- Best regards, Bruce Thursday, December 1, 2005, 10:34:30 AM, you wrote: pcn> I like this. I'ts an attractive picutre. I'd like it a lot pcn> more with the out-of-focus leaf and bloom in the right background pcn> removed. It would be a relatively easy painting job. pcn> Paul >> Frank, >> >> I do appreciate you articulating what you like about this shot. I >> have been trying to determine exactly what holds my attention with >> this one. When I am working on images, I have a directory of images >> that have potential. This one has sat in there for awhile but I >> wasn't ready to toss it. Your comments may help me figure out why I >> like it. >> >> -- >> Bruce >> >> >> Thursday, December 1, 2005, 6:01:55 AM, you wrote: >> >> ft> I like it. >> >> ft> Thistles are such a contradiction. Quite lovely to look at, but a >> ft> real PIA when the stick to one's clothing or skin - all prickly and >> ft> irritating. They remind me of women <LOL> <g, d&r>. >> >> ft> I think you've captured that contradiction here, especially with the >> ft> whithering brown bud in between the other ones. >> >> ft> As usual, technically brilliant. >> >> ft> thanks, >> ft> frank >> ft> -- >> ft> "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson >> >> >> >> >> >> ft> On 12/1/05, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I have had this shot sitting in the electronic pile for awhile. I'm >> >> wondering what you all think of it. I am undecided, but there is >> >> something that holds my interest. Thoughts appreciated. >> >> >> >> Pentax *istD, Tamron 90/2.8 AF Macro, handheld >> >> ISO 200, 1/500 sec @ f/5.6 >> >> Converted from Raw using Capture One LE >> >> >> >> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2191.htm >> >> >> >> >>
