I'll give it a try. I'm just basing that comment on what adobe has said
about interpolation in RAW vs. in a converted file mode. To be honest,
I've never shot any jpegs with either of my Ds. I wanted to be totally
in synch with working in RAW, so I never even tried it. But I will.
Might be fun.
Paul
On Dec 1, 2005, at 5:30 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 1/12/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
That's true if the subject of your shot doesn't demand an extended
range. However, if you're working with bright highlights and deep
shadows, you can achieve more with RAW than you can with a perfectly
exposed jpeg. RAW also enables better fine tuning of color temperature
and better upsizing of the file.
I agree with everything there Paul........except that last bit :-)
Promise me you'll do a little test - shoot the same (well lit) scene in
both RAW and jpeg. Stick them both through PS and bump them both up to
A3. Examine. Report back.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com
_____________________________
