On Dec 1, 2005, at 5:00 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 03:53:34PM -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Dec 1, 2005, at 2:18 PM, John Francis wrote:
I don't need ACR 3.2, or whatever the latest version is; 3.1 (or
even 2.3)
works just fine with images from my D
I find that ACR 3.2 improved processing speed and quality over ACR
3.1, and I expect that ACR 3.3 will do the same over v3.2.
Why wouldn't you want the most recent version?
As has already been mentioned, I can get and run it with Elements 3,
should I choose to do so. Were I running CS 2 I probably would get
each new update as it came along, but I didn't see anything listed
in the changes between 3.1 and 3.2 that would affect me; as far as
I could see the new changes weren't in the basic interface available
through Elements, but in the advanced processing only available from
the CS2 interface.
Improved processing speed and quality would be in the ACR conversion
code that all modes use, John. It's not a "feature" so much as an
developmental enhancement. Most of what they list for the dot-dot
releases are new features and capabilities, or bug fixes, but
development continues on performance and quality outside of those
things.
Godfrey
