I'm surprised, and I don't buy it. I've printed the same image at 200
and 360, and the difference was not hard to see. It was a subtle
difference, but easily detectable. I've tried this more than once. If
200 dpi yielded satisfactory results, everyone would print at a lower
resolution. But virtually no one does.
Paul
Paul
On Dec 4, 2005, at 6:13 PM, Bob Shell wrote:
On Dec 4, 2005, at 6:00 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Any of the "image quality" advocates up for doing a comparison test?
I've already done it. Same image at 200, 300, and 360 ppi. Showed
the prints to some photographer friends. None could see any
difference. I standardized on 300, because I had to pick something
and it worked well for my other requirements. As for printing speed
comparisons, Epson printers are all so effing slow that I start the
printing and go off somewhere and do something else for a few hours,
so it doesn't matter to me.
Bob
