You math guys are a pain in the butt :-))
Paul
On Dec 5, 2005, at 1:09 AM, John Francis wrote:
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 06:00:50PM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Bill Lawlor
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Bob Korn(Santa Fe Workshops) swears Epson printers need
t360 or multiples hereof. It's about the drivers and heads somehow.
Rob at the light Room in Berkeley (Bill, you've been there with me
and
have seen at least some of his work) "suggests" 360 dpi when
working with
the 9600. That printer is much like several other Epson printers
except
for the size prints it can make.
Yet another advocate of 360 dpi on Epson. I've heard a lot of this
before. That's why I print at 360. More importantly, my prints look
good at that resolution. So why not? No, it may not be necessary, and
it takes 20% more storage space than a 300 dpi file . . .
I make it 44% more storage space.
