It's a hard lens to find, I haven't seen any for sale for a while. So that
brings us back to the original question: With the F2.0 Pentaxes cositng
too much, and the F2.8 Pentaxes stink, and the sole F3.5 is rare, are there
any good, inexpensive, 3rd party 35mm lenses out there? (or should I just
cough up the money for a FA 35mm F2?)
Todd
At 07:48 PM 7/22/01 -0700, you wrote:
>I looked for the K35/3.5 for quite a while before I
>gave up and got a Super Takumar 35/3.5 (optically the
>same) for a song. It's ok to focus "on the go" down
>to f/5.6, which is about as far as I'll normally stop
>down anyway, unless I'm shooting a landscape, at which
>point the manual diaphram isn't too big of an
>inconvenience.
>
>William in Utah.
>
>Paul Jones wrote:
>>
>>
>> > I'm after a 35mm lense [...]
>> >
>> > So getting to the point, whats out there in the
>35mm focal length? i'm
>not
>> > fussed if it is a pentax brand lense or not and
>the speed doesnt really
>> > matter. I would want it to be decent optically
>though.
>>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
>http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
>-
>This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
>go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
>visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>
>
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
