[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/4/2005 10:11:54 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By the way - DSLR's cost no more than a film scanner. If you choose a
Pentax, you may still use you "analog" lenses for the next 5-10 years.
Jens Bladt
=======
Good advice. Scanning is a PITA.
Actually, DSLRs do cost quite a bit more than something like the Minolta
Dual scanners, and scanners are also easier to get hold of 2nd hand at
reasonable prices. And some of the "photo" flatbeds cost next to
nothing. But I see your point. I certainly wouldn't consider going via a
scanner if I wanted *all* my images in (high-quality) digital form.
However, I'm mostly happy with film, and want to do digital processing
on only a small subset of the pictures (if any)...
And I'm still waiting for the digital, full-frame sensor, MZ-5n of
course ;-)
- Toralf
