Paul Stenquist wrote: > > When you can't print at the highest resolution the printer offers, you > usually have a paper/profile/software settings mismatch. When > everything is dialed in, you should be able to print best at the > highest res. > Paul
It isn't that I can't - just that it seems to look better with photo and photo enhance switched on rather than "best Photo" might be different if I were printing larger ? I just fiddle with the printing until it looks right to me, to be honest ann > On Dec 6, 2005, at 1:51 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: > > > I like the look of premium glossy, but I'm > > printing both sides of > > the paper on this thing I'm working on so the > > double-sided matte is what I'm using. > > > > interesting that "BEST photo isn't > > > > a > > > > graywolf wrote: > >> > >> Ann, I found the same thing with my 820, and the R200 that replaced > >> it. > >> Except I use glossy paper. > >> > >> graywolf > >> http://www.graywolfphoto.com > >> "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" > >> ----------------------------------- > >> > >> Ann Sanfedele wrote: > >> > >>> I'm printing a roughly 4.5 x 6 image on matte > >>> paper on my little old Epson 820 > >>> and it seems fine. INterestingly (or not) the > >>> stuff looks better set at > >>> photo with photo enhance checked rather than Best > >>> Photo - which seemed to > >>> spill too much ink onto the paper. > >>> > >>> > >
