If the NRA gave money to a group that advocated using it's weapons to
kill innocent bystanders that would be true. There's a difference
between advocating for everyones rights and as a byproduct enabling
criminals, and aiding them directly, which is what PITA does.
mike wilson wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
They are part of an organization that condones and donates money to
groups that do. PETA is the "good" public face for a number of
groups that destroy property and harm others. If you don't know that
you haven't looked.
Rather like the NRA has psychotic sociopath members who will one day
cause mayhem with the artefacts that the organisation promotes?
Bob W wrote:
They may be the only ones you see, but they are not the only ones that
exist. Most of the activists do not condone the methods you have been
describing. What is more, there is no evidence in the photos that were
posted that those particular activists were engaged in any illegal or
irresponsible activity, yet somehow they have been tarred with this
brush.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 December 2005 20:50
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: No fur, No photos
Sorry, those are the only activists I see.
Do you have a better word for them, Bob?
Jostein
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
- Re: No fur, No photos P. J. Alling
-
