On 12/11/05, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Without responsibility rights are meaningless. I don't think you even > understand what freedom is if you > "accept" it doesn't exist. I think understand you much better than you > will ever understand me, but then you > are already a slave.
I disagree. Rights are inalienable. That means they can't be taken away from us. Therefore, how can they require "responsibilities"? If our actions (or inactions) can affect our rights (or whether they have them) then they weren't rights in the first place, they were privileges, IMHO. cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
