I could probably part with the K35/2 but I think the K35/3.5 will be buried with me. ;-) "Little Gem" is an apt description.
Don > -----Original Message----- > From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 4:31 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Help me decide, DA40 or FA35??? > > > On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Don Sanderson wrote: > > > Hi Bill, the only reason the 40 is in the running is that I > > already have the K35/2, K35/3.5 and A35/2.8. > > I'll feel a little guilty buying another 35 with the 2 > > excellent K's on the shelf. I've heard so many good things > > about the FA35/2 though......... > > I've never even _seen_ an A35/2! > > > > I do have an M40/2.8 but the rear element is seperating. > > I can see a way out of this Don. If you can take the pain of parting > with a K-lens or two, that is. > > If I was using the 35 much, and esp. if I had a -D, I would probably > have parted company with my excellent K35/3.5 and replaced it with the > FA35/2. YMMV. > > Kostas >
