Den 17. des. 2005 kl. 19.35 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In a message dated 12/16/2005 10:49:17 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Resolution if I need it, tonality, and the soft unsharpness in the
out of focus areas.
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=209002
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=209653
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=210072
Sorry, no Pentax in sight, only an old Bronica SQ-A with PS 180mm,
PS40mm and PS 180mm, respectively, and Ilford Delta 400:
Manual focus, manual film winding, manual exposure, no tripod, no
built in meter, etc. It´s a wonder I get any pictures at all .-)
DagT
=======
Wow. Those are stunning, Dag.
One is simply fantastic. If it was me, though, I might go in pixel
by pixel
and darken up that silver colored tag/hardware on the first boy's
collar.
Simply to tone it down, because it's a bit distracting and right by
his thumb.
Minor point, only suggest it to improve it a tad.
I love that pic!
Two, is interesting, not sure I totally like it, but I was
intriqued, it kept
my interest. Too bad that sand pail was right behind his head. But
interesting motion blur.
Three is great too, not with the emotion of one, but nicely
composed and a
wonderful rock. It looks like a heart. Holding it in his hands,
tons of
symbolism there...
Great shots! I am duly impressed. Please stick with film, if this
is what it
does for you...
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
Thanks Marnie!
I can agree with you regarding the tag, I am considering to retouch
it from the print, but until then I kept it on the digital version.
I have never been able to concentrate on one thing at the time, so I
think I will stick to both film and digital. Both have their own
advantages, medium format for the intensity and concentration it adds
(for me) and digital for its convenience.
DagT
