Yes, Pal I do agree. It's forever been a deal breaker when I learn a body does not allow such. Auto pre-flash or the manual ability to lock up the mirror and then set the self-timer, is ideal. Too much hyper-focus work, using 100 ISO film, to do without it.
--- Pål Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dario Bonazza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > No it doesn't, and the 645N demonstrated that there is no > difference > > between using the MLU or not using it with a well damped mirror > like the > > one of the 645. > > MLU on the 645N was only added for marketing reasons, since so many > asked > > for it. > > > I disagree. There are several instances when you cannot put a camera > on a > ideal surface where the small difference with or without mirror lock > actually makes a difference. However, for ordinary shooting condition > the > lack of mirror lock is a non-issue. > The mirror pre-fire function is also nice elimination the need for a > remote > release. > > Pål > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
