Better.
frank theriault wrote:
Based on some comments received WRT the original post, I've fiddled
around with it (mostly cropped a bit but also slightly different
levels adjustments):
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3958764&size=lg
For your reference, here's the "original":
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3957690&size=lg
Waddya think? Better, worse, same, indifferent either way? How would
you have cropped the original? Much as I don't like to crop, this is
one that requires it, so I'd be interested to know (since I so rarely
crop, I'm not very good at it).
Thanks for your input!
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
