Not exactly, either :-))
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Not exactly traditional...
>
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> > Traditional glamour:
> > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2839432
> >
> > On Dec 19, 2005, at 6:55 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> >
> >> There are a few of us who regularly post photos that are nowhere near
> >> the
> >> category of glamour and traditional portraits. This one is certainly
> >> not a
> >> glamour shot:
> >>
> >> http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/sue.html
> >>
> >>
> >> Shel
> >>
> >>
> >>> [Original Message]
> >>> From: Glen
> >>
> >>
> >>> I was just
> >>> wondering if everyone had become so "glamour" and "traditional
> >>> portrait"
> >>> oriented that an experimental shot which didn't glorify the beauty
> >>> of the
> >>> subject didn't have much of a chance.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> When you're worried or in doubt,
> Run in circles, (scream and shout).
>
