I'd bayonet that you didn't see my earlier post just prior to yours. It's
one of your foibles.
Tom C.
From: "Don Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: OT: Let's make the PDML more interesting!
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 19:01:26 -0600
Is there any way to foil this thread before it gets too
pointed?
D
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 6:42 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: OT: Let's make the PDML more interesting!
>
>
>
> Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote
> >
> > frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>On 12/21/05, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Oh, I don't about that, I expect him to take this to the hilt.
> >>
> >>I think Doug can handle himself. He's used to the thrust and parry of
> >>this list.
> >
> > I can't decide if that's really true or not. I'm sort of on the fence
> > about it...
>
> Mark, I think I get the thrust of your message.
>
> Kenneth Waller
>
