Michael, I think Ballets and Mallets both have two L's. I'm surprised they let you in with a camera to take pictures. Your compositions suffer from being limited to your seat. They are static, much like you would see in a 1950's TV show. Second, you've seen too many of Frank's Fuzzy Fotos. Could you get any pictures after the performance of the dancers up close? Stage makeup and lighting make everything look washed out. Regards, Bob S.
On 12/23/05, Michael Spivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What means "GAAAAK" ? is it so bad ? > BTW no flash used. i was sitting at 20'th row so no flash could reach there. > the shadows you see are from the projectors. > > Michael > > On 12/23/05, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Michael Spivak" > > Subject: swan lake > > > > > > > Last Wednesday my wife decided that balet is more important then the > > > photo club I attend to visit once for a while and took me out for the > > > Swan Lake show that came directly from Moscow. All shots been made > > > with Pentax ME Super + Pentaks Takumar Bayonet 135 F/2.5 > > > You are welcom to comment and critique ! > > > > > > http://mishka.site.co.il/gallery2/main.php?g2_view=core.ShowItem&g2_itemId=3402 > > > > GAAAK!! Looks like flash. > > > > William Robb > > > > > > > > > -- > Yours > Michael > >
