On 28 Dec 2005 at 16:23, Gonz wrote: > Correct, thats the way its done (histogram from jpg). You would have to > have the white balance setting close to actual. But there's no reason > why they cant take an RBG histogram direct from the raw data. A simple > non-bayer filter-like transformation would all that would be needed to > get a white balance accurate histogram, no?
I'm sure that it would be technically easier using RAW data but then I guess they would end up confusing the greater part of the DSLR using public. > I guess the lesson in all this is that even if you are only using RAW, > you should still set the white balance, at least for the sake of an > accurate histogram. Which is one of the reasons I do :-) Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
