Rob Studdert wrote on 29.12.05 17:14: > In this case obviously no one knows exactly what's going on, so since the > image > was RGB in origin then it should likely be presented to the printers as such. > They should be able to make an appropriate CMYK conversion and colours that > fall out of gamut can be assessed in the proof. The gamut of direct to print > or > laser printers is all over the place, it varies with paper and > ink/toner/screen > resolution. Executing a CMYK conversion without knowing the characteristics of > the print process is worse than making none from my experience. We have too little information about this laser printer. If it has built-in postscript RIP with standard web offset colours simulation than I guess it won't be easy to convince them to change RIP settings so that it could use full colour gamut available in printer. Things would be even more complicated if it would require separated file but I guess rather no. I think we need more detailed data about this printer to give Adam good advice.
-- Balance is the ultimate good... Best Regards Sylwek
