Hi!
True Boris, true. But in defend of my friend I can tell that as much as
he was satisfied with EOS-3 he was very upset with performance of 20D
for three reasons - AF speed in low light (here Nikon is leader), AF
accuracy and frequent overexposure problems with metering in this
Canon. He had none of these problems with analog body (no surprise for
me, as EOS-3 is a kinda higher class body with 45 sensors AF like in
1Dxxx series). He didn't want to pay for any body from 1D family and
thus probably his decision.
I don't live in Canon land, but perhaps Canon produced firmware updates
that attended some of 20D problems you listed. Say, some folk reported
that *istDS mCode 2.0 improved some on AF operation. Also, there is
always a chance that his very camera was a bad sample and he could've
exchanged it for another 20D (by warranty)...
I haven't heard as serious a complaint about 20D yet. Though like I
said, I don't live in Canon land.
And still, well, 20D was a disappointment for him... Is it the end of
the world? I hardly think so...
I suppose it makes no sense to pursue this branch of the topic, but I am
still left in wonder.
Boris
- Re: Canon 1Ds MarkII Test Drive Boris Liberman
-