On 1/1/06, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That was me mentioning how well M42 lenses work on DSLR's. And the film > *ist should be no different for that.
Thanks Adam. I had forgotten who made the comment. The film *ist is no different when it comes to M42 lenses. > > Cost savings. The M42 lenses just need metering, the K/M lenses need > hardware that the M42 and KA and later lenses don't require. > > I'm up to two M42 lenses, and looking at more. I also picked up an SP, > so I need some more (need something in the 20-24mm range, a 35mm and > something around 85mm) Don't we all? I'm seriously considering dumping my M lenses and picking up a handful of Super-Takumars and FA lenses. > > -Adam > -- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com -- "You have to hold the button down" -Arnold Newman
