On 5 Jan 2006 at 16:09, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > The film was all Tri-X, I believe. IAC, all conventional B&W. The photog > usually processed the film himself, only relying on outside labs or > assistants when absolutely necessary. BTW, this was several years ago. > Regardless, he is a ~very~ successful photographer.
If it were B&W and off the roll I'm sure you could get costs down for this type of volume, but just the sheer number of shots you'd have to make in such a relatively short time is beyond me. I'd end up with RSI of the shutter finger and a cramp in the other and no desire whatsoever to shoot again for some time. If it worked for your photographer friend then that's great but I suspect that for some people limiting themselves to shooting one good frame a day would be good for their photography too. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
