>In this case I saw the original, have the original transparency, did the 
>original scan, adjusted the output to the degree I felt appropriate, and 
>some still find it too blue.  It may be a difference in monitor calibration 
>or it may just be that our brains want to see something different.

Tom, I've had the same experience, especially under unusual conditions - like 
canyon klick in southern Utah, wildlife images taken in flat light, some snow 
images etc.

>It may be a difference in monitor calibration 
>or it may just be that our brains want to see something different

....Or that some people will suspect PS alterations because it can be done.

Kenneth Waller

-----Original Message-----
>From: Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>Subject: Re: PESO - The Red Garage
>
>Ahh... Thank you... I find it interesting that many on the list, possibly 
>even I, have a tendency to think or believe that we know what the original 
>captured scene looked like, or should look like, when it's only the 
>photographer themself that was present to see that scene.
>
>In this case I saw the original, have the original transparency, did the 
>original scan, adjusted the output to the degree I felt appropriate, and 
>some still find it too blue.  It may be a difference in monitor calibration 
>or it may just be that our brains want to see something different.
>
>Tom C.
>
>>From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>I actually do like it somewhat better this way, but, obviously,  have
>>no idea what tone paint was actually used.
>>
>>Jack
>>
>>http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=98
>>
>
>


________________________________________
PeoplePC Online
A better way to Internet
http://www.peoplepc.com

Reply via email to