As others have pointed out, he is innocent until proven guilty. This is true even if he admits that he did it. He isn't working somewhere that children are at risk. You should probably assume that if you know who he is, then the store owner does too.
If you say anything to the store owner you will be contributing to a moral climate where the mere accusation of child abuse is seen as establishing guilt, and which leads to lynch mobs patrolling the streets and destroying pediatrician's houses - as happened here a few years ago. But pending the outcome of the trial you might want to consider taking your business elsewhere. -- Cheers, Bob > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Waterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 08 January 2006 03:23 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Vigilant or Bloody Minded > > I recently walked into a large Sydney camera store and > ventured to the "pro section" to purchase some Fuji Provia. I > was astounded that the person serving me was an ex-photog who > is currently in the midst of a child porn investigation. He > worked with his uncle who has been charged and a trial is due. > > My question is, should I make the store owner aware of who is > working for him? > Am I being vigilant or is it sheer bloody mindedness on my part? > Is this really none of my business? > I must admit this sort of thing boils my blood quickly. > > Kind regards > Kevin > > -- > "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. > Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." > > > >
