At 12:25 PM 1/9/2006, you wrote:
The question in my mind is what did he specifically admit to? None of us
know to what he exactly admitted. For example, he may have taken innocent
pics and his uncle may have sent them to porn sites. He may have some
peripheral involvement, but not enough to be guilty of any crimes. IOW, we
on this list do not know enough to make a reasonable judgement. We only
know what Kevin has said, and he admits to having a bias as his children
were allegedly photographed. Kevin has not provided enough specific
information about what this man has allegedly done. Some of the statements
Kevin has made is leading me to think that he is biased, prejudicial,
mean-spirited, and irrational.
If there were any extenuating circumstances, I would think he - the
perp - would have mentioned them. I don't believe we are talking
about taking pictures in the bathtub or a group of shirtless
4-year-olds playing in a splash pool.
The man has injured innocent children. He must pay for his crime. His
rights ended when he admitted what he did.
Gary J Sibio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~garysibio
There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand
binary numbers and those who do not.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.16/224 - Release Date: 1/9/2006
