IMO, that's the way it should be. Considering the number of photos they receive, assuming they receive a lot, is there enough time to look carefully at each pic?
Shel > [Original Message] > From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Date: 1/11/2006 3:35:56 AM > Subject: Re: Scary Condoleezza Eyes > > Interesting. The New York Times won't permit any PhotoShop alterations > whatsoever. Even background clutter must remain in the photo. Before I > could sell photos to the Times I had to sign documents pledging that I > would provide only unaltered photos. The photo editors carefully > examine all submissions for any signs of alteration. I'm sure one could > slip a minor cleanup by them, but anything of consequence would > probably be detected. > Paul > On Jan 11, 2006, at 12:40 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > > http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=47066 > > > > Journalism at its best ... > > > > > > Shel > > > > > >
