I can't help you with this particular scanner. I have the Super Coolscan IV.
I only use the digital ICE function on my scanner. I believe this is what Shaw & Lepp reccommend. Kenneth Waller -----Original Message----- >From: Tim Sherburne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Jan 13, 2006 1:26 PM >To: Pentax Discussion List <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: Nikon Coolscan 9000 ED problem? > > >No experience to offer with this scanner in particular, but you didn't >mention the brand of scanner software. You may want to try VueScan if you're >not using that already (http://www.hamrick.com/). You can download and test >drive it for free. > >I wasn't having much success with my Minolta 5400's bundled software, but >VueScan was a worthwhile upgrade in my case. > >Something else to consider is the amount of RAM it may take to perform the >"post-processing" for a MF frame. Are you simply running low on RAM and the >software has stupid error messages? (Wouldn't be the first time...) > >Tim > >On 1/13/06 7:51, Pål Jensen wrote: > >> Anyone on this list using this scanner? >> >> Some observations: >> >> This scanner is excellent. >> The MF film holder is close to useless - you need the glass holder which >> incidentally cost a fortune and must be the most profitable item in the >> history of manufactured goods. >> The highlight/shadow adjustment functions are excellent. However, it creates >> artifacts. Anyway to minimize or remove these? >> >> The main problem: Grain removal function (digital GEM) do not work with >> Medium Format (work well with 35mm). I get an error message when using this >> function when scanning (preview works) saying "There was an error performing >> a post processing" (sounds like a software problem). Is this normal (theres >> nothing in the manual saying it doesn't work with MF)? >> >> >> Pål >> >> >> >> > > > ________________________________________ PeoplePC Online A better way to Internet http://www.peoplepc.com
