Which assertion? The one that Full-frame sensors are extremely sensitive
to edge performance and consumer lenses generally underperform on FF
because of that? That's well documented in reviews of pretty much every
FF camera of the last few years. There's a reason Canon introduced a new
L lens just for the 5d, and it is simply that the 28-135 IS shows its
warts on full-frame.
Or that the 1.3x crop cameras are more susceptible to edge performance
issues than 1.6x crop cameras. That's simple geometry. If the camera
uses more of the edge, it will be more susceptible to issues with edge
performance. Digital is generally more sensitive to lens performance,
even with 1.6x cameras.
-Adam
Cotty wrote:
On 19/1/06, Adam Maas, discombobulated, unleashed:
The 1.3x crop size also is more susceptible to
poor edge performance that is avoided with the APS-C cameras and plagues
full-frame (Consumer lenses are generally unusable on Full Frame cameras
because of how apparent their weaknesses become).
Can I see some resources please to back up this claim?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com
_____________________________
