On Jan 19, 2006, at 9:01 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I have seen cyanotype and platinum/paladium prints, they're even better if the source image is exceptional, such as an 4x5 or 8x10 plate.
This gentleman's source material was exceptional. All of it, whether film or digital negative from other sources. He explicitly showed originals, negatives and positives, in demonstrating the process.
How is it that you can debate with such assurance against the quality of something that you haven't even seen and therefore have no ability to judge with any credibility?
Godfrey
