> > From: "Dario Bonazza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2006/01/20 Fri AM 09:42:56 GMT > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Optio WPi > > And the WP has a very good lens too! Comparing it to Optio S6, Optio SV, and > Optio 60 (same pictures in same situation), those taken with the WP were the > best of the bunch. > > Dario
Thanks. Is the only difference between the WP and the WPI the number of pixels? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sylwester Pietrzyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 10:24 AM > Subject: Re: Optio WPi > > > > mike wilson wrote on 20.01.06 9:10: > > > >> Anyone got any experience with the above, or the WP? > > Not exactly with WP, but with older 33WR. A LOT OF FUN!!! We took many > > photos underwater in Red Sea with my friend - no problems at all, I used > > it > > many times at pools - preformed very good, attracting people's attention > > ;-) > > And I think good digicam should be like that - you don't have to worry > > even > > in dust/dirt/water. What's the fun with digicam if you have to worry about > > it all the time? ;-) WPi has higher JIS class, meaning that it is even > > more > > water resistant than 33WR, so you can't go wrong with it! > > > > -- > > Balance is the ultimate good... > > > > Best Regards > > Sylwek > > > > ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
