On 23 Jan 2006 at 13:47, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > No, I mean that "facts" often found in Wikipedia have been changed and > altered by reader input, at least that's my understanding. IOW, it can't be > trusted to be a neutral and honest reference.
You really do have to research how Wiki works and also consider how any other "classic" reference have been forged, I prefer the Wiki model, in the end it will lead to a wider and more thorough reference. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
