When I started serious photography back in the Sixties, Kodachrome colors were the standard for making other color films. The other slide film was Ektachrome, but it wasn't on par with Kodachrome. I tried Kodachrome 64, but didn't like it compared to K25.
Jim A. >> >> From: Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: 2006/01/24 Tue PM 03:14:26 GMT >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Re: Kodachrome 25 >> >> On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, mike wilson wrote: >> >> >> From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> Date: 2006/01/24 Tue PM 12:40:21 GMT >> >> To: <[email protected]> >> >> Subject: Re: Kodachrome 25 >> >> >> >> Kodachrome is still available. >> >> >> > >> > Not 25, sadly. Unless someone wants to make an offer for my remaining >> roll. >> > >> > Also, there is only the Swiss facility in Europe for processing. You >> can't even send your film to your national centre for forwarding any >> more. >> >> Isn't it E6? What is special about it? >> >> Interested for general knowledge, > > I forget the name of the process (it's something like K13 - you will find > it in google) but it is a process that inserts dye into the film rather > than causing dye precursors to become visible, as E6 does. It is a much > more complicated process than E6. > > http://historicphotoarchive.com/index.html > http://www.subclub.org/shop/kodachro.htm > > <high controversy> > It's also a much better system than E6. > </high controversy> > > mike > > > ----------------------------------------- > Email sent from www.ntlworld.com > Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software > Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information > >
