I just started a contract at home. My poor 67 never even got inside my
front door until last night. It's time to start using it!
The disposable was only because I had forgotten my *ist D that day. I skied
with it last weekend two days. Now I could be convinced to get a DA 40 for
it. The 31 LTD was a little bulky under my coat.
Tom C.
From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: P645D
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 21:00:06 -0000
From Fuji throwaway to Pentax 67. You certainly cover a wide range, Tom.
John
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:02:40 -0000, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just bought 20 rolls of 220 Velvia 50 and 100 yesterday for the 67.
You guys watch out and get ready to put on your tinted glasses.
Tom C.
From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: P645D
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:14:52 -0000
I've already said that Pentax is far too late in releasing this camera.
However, I suspect it might be moderately successful. Many of the
people who used to shoot with the 645 will have held onto their lenses,
so their only cost in switching back will be the new body, and perhaps
a new wide-angle.
It's certainly going to push second-hand lens prices up a bit. If they
reach a happy stage where they tempt people to sell them, but are not
too expensive to buy, then I am sure some small-format DSLR people
would be interested because it will be a cheaper way into big sensors
than going Canon FF, and there is none of the hassle and cost of
shooting big negatives/slides which used to put people off using film
MF.
Of course, much will depend on price.
John
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
