I believe that part c) you mention below is only needed after you have a certain
number of pros. Pentax is capable of handling the relative low nomber of pro users
within their current infrastructure. Thats why I don't think Pentax is keen to aquire
a higher percentage of pro users because that may mean they have to invest in a pro
dedicated infrastructure than can cater a high number of pro shooters and their needs.
P�l
----- Original Message -----
From: "Collin Brendemuehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 3:37 PM
Subject: Re: Professional
> We're getting into some definition problems here.
> Is Professional:
> a. Build quality
> b. Feature Set
> c. Support Structure
>
> Can you remove any one of the three and still have
> a "professional" camera?
>
> I'd say yes, but a "better" pro solution would be to
> have all three present.
>
> Remove two and you've got a something strange, that
> no intelligent marketing department would support.
>
> My understanding is that Pentax has (a) and (b). Not
> to the same degree as some others, but it's stuiable none-
> the-less.
>
> BTW, I've not seen (c) as a part any medium or large format
> "professional" solution.
>
> jmnsho,
>
> Collin
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <><
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
