On 29 Jan 2006 at 14:07, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > Rob, in another message, suggested that the allowable size of the > submissions be increased. I'm pretty much for that as well, providing that > the increase is to a dimension that can fit on a certain sized monitor (say > 17") without having to scroll around to see the entire photo. I'm sure > such a dimension can be agreed upon, as anything will be larger than what > we now have. The size of the image could, IMO, easily be doubled without > causing hardship on the viewers - even with a slow, dial-up connection a > 150kb - 200kb file can be handled without undue stress or delay. > > To start the ball rolling, perhaps a file with dimensions no greater than > 800x600 would be acceptable.
The file size constraints that we have for pug images were mostly a function of server space/bandwidth, unless file space and bandwidth limits changed for the better for our page hosts then we can't expect more unfortunately. Remember it's a service provided for free without the benefit of advertising revenue or subscriptions like most other photo hosting sites. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
