Gautam Sarup wrote:

Ken is it totally off or do you think something could be
done to give it some appeal?

Thanks,
Gautam

Ken has touched on the reeason for it's lack of appeal, but I think a clarification might be in order. Too late with the current image, but for later shots, you might find a way to increase the depth of field to put the entire carving in focus. There are a lot of "elements" to that piece of art, and it will only be interesting to see it in person, or for it to be all in focus. Even as it is, I found myself finding new interesting objects to look at, but since they were not quite sharp, interest fades...

Some subjects are very difficult to portray in a photograph, simply because of their complexity. This may be one of those. Interesting to look at in person, but how it affects you then won't be captured on film...

This may be one of those!

Just my 2ยข  --

keith whaley


On 1/28/06, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Sorry, but this has no appeal for me.

Kenneth Waller


----- Original Message -----
From: "Gautam Sarup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO: no name



No name and no Pentax content either.  This was shot with an M6
and 50mm Elmar on Efke KB100 in the San Francisco Chinatown.

Comments are welcome.

http://static.flickr.com/42/81380197_98d51dd376_b.jpg

Cheers,
Gautam

Reply via email to