[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

In a message dated 1/30/2006 9:10:05 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm not opposed to there being a 3rd section of the gallery each month - Non-Pentax gear.

Tom C.
========
Hmmm. Not a bad idea. We could even label that section Darkside Defectors.

Hehehehe.

Although I am not sure if that covers Leica.

I am also fine keeping it the way it is. But I must I am say I am intrigued by an open, open section.

Look at it this way, it would just go to show that Pentax gear is better, when one compares the shots side by side.

Marnie aka Doe ;-)
I think it's more likely to show that the equipment doesn't matter; the photographer does. Some of the better PUGgers have a dark side or two, and depending what they show at the time, that might give the wrong impression of which gear is better. (Frank, for instance, has a Leica he's not afraid to use; César and Godfrey are apparently quite ecumenical in their equipment choices, etc.)
I don't feel *very* strongly about this, but since Darkside Defectors can, and 
do, post PESOs, I'm content to keep the PUG for Pentax gear.
(Of which, as you reassured me, you also own some ... )

ERN



Reply via email to