On 9 Feb 2006 at 6:33, Paul Stenquist wrote: > Huh? We just read that there will be a higher spec camera come > Photokina. We don't even know what the specs are yet, but you've > already decided that it's not good enough. That's so typical of the > mindless negativism that pervades the list.
It's all about timing and delivery, what ever comes when it comes better be spec'd better then the current bodies or it won't just be me generating what you mistakenly deem as "mindless negativism". Heard of the boy who cried wolf? > We're tired of reading how you're going to do that. Shit or get off the > pot. Given that often local Pentax distributors have problems determining if current lenses are in or out of production or are or are not available (or even if they exist in some cases) I find it hard to view the article with other than a little scepticism. Given the suggested time line in that article what is your personal assessment of a potential date of actual availability for a body that would qualify as a replacement for the *ist D? BTW I was surprised at your retort I might occasionally be a stubborn curmudgeon but try not to be an outwardly rude bastard and as such I don't expect to be replied to in such a fashion. PS And thanks for the tip but I can work out when to get off the pot myself. Cheers, Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
