On Feb 9, 2006, at 2:24 PM, William Robb wrote:
Sure, it was informal. But, unfortunately, I don't think a company
can do an
informal approach when copyright issues for personal property/
creativity are
involved.
As far as I was able to tell from the initial request, there were
no copyright issues.
On a somewhat different topic, with the exception of the 3 people
on list who actually earn a living doing photography, any issues
revolving around copyright is little more than arrogant bullshit,
and the three people here who earn their living at photography
seemed to be the ones who gave freely of their work, no questions
asked.
I don't know if I'm one of your three, but regardless of whether one
makes a living from photography or not, copyright is important. I
don't know of any working pro who disregards the importance of
copyright. It's what enables us to make a living doing photography.
Bob
