Alin wrote: > Definitely contrary to my experience. More than half of my slides > exposed with multisegment were totally compromised by overexposure. Thats seem pretty starnge to me. I have no experience with the MZ-5n but my experience with multi pattern metering is that it can be considered "right" close to 90% of the time. A 50% failure rate seem to be about right for centerweighted metering. > The only problem is that multisegment compensates mainly towards > overexposure and rarely does it towards underexposure. If the > contrast range is high - more than 4 stops as measured by different > segments of the meter, the more likely is that the algorithm will > choose to expose for the dark areas. This may be true for the MZ-5n but not for the 645n and the MZ-S based on preliminary results. P�l - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Re: Multi-segment metering and exposure compensation Artur Led�chowski
- Re: Multi-segment metering and exposure compensa... Mark Roberts
- Re:: Multi-segment metering and exposure compensation P�l Jensen
- Re: Multi-segment metering and exposure compensation Nicholas Wright
- Re: Multi-segment metering and exposure compensation Mark Cassino
- Re: Multi-segment metering and exposure compensation Nicholas Wright
- Re: Multi-segment metering and exposure compensation Ronachai Pratanaphon
- Re: Multi-segment metering and exposure compensation Bojidar Dimitrov
- Re: Multi-segment metering and exposure compensation Nicholas Wright
- Re: Re[2]: Multi-segment metering and exposure compen... P�l Jensen
- Re: Re[2]: Multi-segment metering and exposure c... Bob Rapp
- Re: Multi-segment metering and exposure compensa... Alin Flaider
- Re: Multi-segment metering and exposure comp... Tom Rittenhouse
- Re: Multi-segment metering and exposure compensa... Bill Owens
- Re: Multi-segment metering and exposure compensation Joseph Tainter

