And once again, nobody included the URL to the pics ... ~Please Don't Delete The URL's ~ ... Thank you in advance for subsequent consideration.
Shel > [Original Message] > From: Igor Roshchin > Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:30:41 -0800 > mike wilson wrote: > > > > PS. Rather interesting effect on IMGP2945: > > > two horizontal lines, better noticeable on the island. > > > Seems to be a weather or spray phenomenon. It's on 2943, also. > > What do you mean by "spray phenomenon"? > There are several different things people call "spray phenomenon", > but I was not able relate those to the observed. > Do you mean the same as what I describe below? > > Indeed, it is on 2943 as well, and as I just noticed - there are > also two lines (not one as I had thought). > > > Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:38:46 -0800 > Jens Bladt wrote: > > > Very nice photographs, Igor. > > Do ahve an explanation for the virticval line thing? > > Great lens, isn't is? > > Regards > > Jens > > Thank you! > > Did you mean "horizontal line"? > (I don't see any vertical lines of a particular interest) > No, I don't have explanation. > I am thinking if it could be due to the light reflected from the water > that then gets scattered by the lower air layers (which should > also contain more water mist that can produce this light scattering). > Nevertheless, I am puzzled why there are clearly seen _two_ lines. > If these photos were taken with a film camera I would've started > looking if something left a trace on the film when it was advanced. > > As for the lens, - I am not completely sure. It is good, > but I was expecting something better. As I said, I didn't > notice much difference from the Tamron lens > (image 2943 was taken with Tamron). > > > Igor
