Mishka wrote:
my comments inline,

best,
mishka

On 2/15/06, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Wahabbi extremist leaders is a guy named Osama
Bin Laden.


and just how did he impose his religion on the other
countries? and on which?

His stated goal is to impose Sharia on the entire world. His attack on the US on 9/11 was planned to start a global Jihad which would result in the return of the Caliphate, imposition of Sharia on the Dar-al-Islam and then the eventual expansion of the Dar-al-Islam to encompass the entire globe. He was involved with the imposition of Wahhabist-style Sharia on Afghanistan though (He worked closely with the Taliban, and still does).



a major funder of the Taliban (Who were Wahabbist,
and portions thereof did invade Afghanistan to
impose Sharia


afghanistan has been an islamic country, well before
taleban appeared on the radar. they lived under
sharia all along (except for a short period of
soviet occupation).

Afghanistan was not under Sharia law prior to the Soviet invasion. They had a brief period of self-rule, under a democracy of sorts. The impositoin of Sharia happened in 1996, after a civil war which followed the Soviet pull-out. There is a distinct difference between a muslim country, and one under the rule of Sharia law. Right now only Iran and Saudi Arabia are truly under Shari law, other muslim nations have either limited implementations of Sharia, or a mostly secular legal apparatus.



Saudi's are also major funders of
extremist Islamic groups worldwide, and Saudi
funded groups actively promote both violence
and imposition of Sharia wherever they are found
(And they are heavily active in the UK, and to a lesser
extent in the US).


don't know about UK, but i am blanking trying
to remember who was imposing sharia on who, here
in the US.
the mormons and jehova's witnesses, otoh, have been
quite annoying in the supermarkets...

Not imposing, trying to impose (they've not succeeded, closest they came was in getting Sharia added to the list of religious arbitration options ofr Family Law, the government responded by ending all religious-based arbitration). There's a difference. And one of the differences is in methods. The Mormons and JW's try to convert by talking to you, the Wahabbists are willing to kill you. If you look at who has been organizing these 'spontaneous' demonstrations in London over the Mohammed Cartoons, you'll see which groups I'm referring to.

-Adam

Reply via email to