No sorry, you still have it backwards IMO :-) ...
*Believing* that one does want a belief system is itself a system of belief.
Everyone *believes* in something, even if it's that they don't need to
believe in anything else other than their own little postulated view of
reality.
Show me a person without beliefs and I'll either show you a corpse or
someone that is legally brain dead.
(I'm taking belief system as used previously in this discussion as a loose
euphanism for religious faith of any sort).
Tom C.
From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: OT Religion, Christ vs. the Other Guy
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:51:21 -0000
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:42:52 -0000, DagT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Den 16. feb. 2006 kl. 22.23 skrev Tom C:
Collin wrote:
Not believing that a belief system is required, is itself a belief
system, and is based on less empirical evidence than many so-called
belief system.
"Not believing" is by definition NOT a belief system. A belief system
requires belief.
John
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
