keith_w wrote:
Keith McGuinness wrote:
[big snip]
God only becomes an option when he/she/it is included in a testable
hypothesis. God cannot be detected, therefore the only possible
evidence for or against a God hypothesis are the results of actions
performed by God.
Uhhh, by whom? If nothing can be tested, how can some God be sensed or
perceived, or for that matter, believed?
When somethng happens that some attribute to a God's action or
interaction, it's only so because some human wanted it to be so
attributed. In other words, it's only "obvious" when some human points
is out and explains why it can only be a result of divine intervention...
Uh huh...
I think I expressed myself poorly.
I agree completely with your second paragraph.
I was trying to say...well, what you said in that second paragraph...
Keith McG
