I don't see a definition for a "kind of photography" in that quote,
Kostas. I see a statement relating to a kind of equipment. What kind
of PHOTOGRAPHS is the equipment intended to make? That's photography.
Godfrey
On Feb 24, 2006, at 2:09 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
And what kind of photography is that, really? Have you defined it?
Yes, but you deleted it:
The LX with its superb finders and the old array of high
performance fast lenses made a pretty smick kit for low light work.
If the new DLSR behaves similarly to the D200 at high ISO I doubt
that I'm going to be overly excited, proof is in the pudding of
course be it a year ore more away. It's apparent that Pentax are
heading in a totally different direction now, they are carving a
niche of kit biased towards small rather than fast.
