I would still use a tripod in the same situations. At least that's my purity of thought at the moment. SR might tempt me to shoot hand held too often. SR is NOT a big deal with me. Landscapes don't move around a great deal. :-))
Jack --- Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been thinking this over. Always dangerous. > > Without SR I am not sure I would buy the 10 mp camera. It would > depend on whether the increase in resolution offsets the > increase in noise -- for my shooting. Also, there would > undoubtedly be a camera with SR following on in two or three > years, and I would want it. I cannot buy a new DSLR every two or > three years. Without SR, I might skip this generation of the D. > > With SR I would want it. (Having the funds to buy it is a > different matter.) Having SR would mean that it would be less > necessary to use higher ISOs, so the higher noise would become > less of an issue. Also, the fact that Pentax is not bringing out > fast primes would be less of an issue. > > So I hope the rumor is true. > > Joe > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
