Most of the art fair guys I speak with are shooting digital and making
their own prints. Cost control, quality control.
Paul
On Feb 25, 2006, at 4:46 PM, graywolf wrote:
Or to put it another way, whether to shoot jpegs or raw depends upon
the intended quality of the final image.
I kind of doubt that many advertising photographers shoot Jpegs, or
the gal shooting Santa photos at the mall is shooting in raw mode.
Also I doubt that there are many truly serious artistic photographers
who are shooting digital (not the guys who are selling their photos at
art fairs who are in about the same catagory as the starving artist
--3 oil paintings for $20-- guys).
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------
Paul Stenquist wrote:
From my experience in various press venues, I'd say that magazine
photographers shoot RAW, newspaper photographers shoot jpeg.
Paul
On Feb 25, 2006, at 1:24 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 12:37:04AM -0800, David wrote:
I mostly shoot action (cycling, Cyclocross in particular), here's my
humble thoughts.
. . . .
3) Find me one action photographer that wastes his space with raw
files. They require lots of extra time to process. Most action
photographers I know shoot action with jpg.
This s the one point where I would disagree with you. Almost all the
action photographers I know from my times in the media room at motor
races shoot RAW. Who do you think is buying those 12GB CF cards?
