Thanks, Bob. I was trying for a different perspective and I'm happy to
see that my efforts were noticed. :-)
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Like Bruce says, the first is a bit better but they both offer a
different perspective on photographing the birds. The sharp eyes and
cut off parts add to the impression of being very close. Regards,
Bob S.
On 2/27/06, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Christian,
First shot is pretty nice. I don't mind the washed out sky. The
cropped tail is too bad, but doesn't ruin the image. I like that you
are presented something a little different in a bird picture. The
image almost gives me a feeling of being close to this bird, more like
a pet or something.
The second one is good too, but doesn't grab me as much.
I do appreciate you sharing your efforts. You provide inspiration and
ideas for me that I am thankful for.
Keep up the good work!
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Sunday, February 26, 2006, 4:05:34 PM, you wrote:
C> 2 images from today for your review:
C> http://photography2.skofteland.net:8080/displayimage.php?pos=-49
C> http://photography2.skofteland.net:8080/displayimage.php?pos=-50
