I've just enabled myself with a Sigma 70-200 EX f/2.8, I've been in need of a relatively fast 200mm AF lens for some time but my budjet was limited. My thinking was to use the lens primarily as a fast 200 (no suprises there) but also as a replacement when used with the Sigma 2x EX TC for my Sigma 135-400 APO. Has anyone done a direct comparison between the two? Do you think I'm right in judging the EX + 2x TC to be better optically than the dedicated 135- 400? (there's no doubt in my mind it's better ergonomically and build quality wise)
BTW anyone looking for a Sigma 2x EX TC, I appear to have two now, asking around £70 (GBP) PayPal welcome. Regards, John John Whittingham Technician "you can't be optimistic with a misty optic" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in error please notify Carmel College on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems. Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email attachments for viruses we cannot guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any responsibility for viruses. Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for inappropriate content, the college cannot be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author. The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel College cannot be held responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
